Blog

Four crises of the apocalypse

What do the following four crises all have in common?

In late 2001 it was revealed that Enron’s reported financial condition (alleged revenues of $101bn the previous year) was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud (ably assisted by Arthur Andersen LLP). Enron has since become a popular symbol of wilful corporate fraud and corruption.

In 2008 large parts of the world suffered as a result of a financial crisis which was subsequently deemed an “avoidable” disaster caused by widespread failures in government regulation, corporate mismanagement and heedless risk-taking by Wall Street, according to the conclusions of a federal inquiry.

In 2009 news of MPs falsifying and fraudulently claiming expenses leaked and was then published by the Telegraph. It was subsequently revealed this practice had gone on for several years.

In 2011 Rupert Murdoch, his son James, Rebekah Brooks and others are feeling the heat of the phone hacking scandal, and much more as what seems like organisation wide appalling leadership and behaviour was revealed on an almost daily basis.

They were all caused (in part at least) by an absence of engagement and therefore a reliance on management seeking to coerce people, to bend others to their will. Behaviour that we know to be wrong goes unchecked as a result of fear, a lack of questioning, and a false belief that “I don’t need to say anything, surely someone else must be flagging this.”

A couple of weeks ago Jonathan Wilson and I were invited to talk at Cass Business School with the Organisational Development Innovation Network (ODiN), about stakeholder engagement. As evidenced by these (and other) examples of management failing, us humans are slow learners. Nevertheless something sometimes comes along and tips the balance, opens the door to different thinking. We hope the recent News International scandal may mark a turning away from management and arrogance, towards more engaging and confident ways of working.

We wanted to expose the audience to different ways of engaging. So we experimented with song, a pecha kucha, a few rounds of world café conversations, and another song to conclude. It was our intention to share useful methods as well as our learning and reflection. We spent a lively afternoon facilitating conversation. Some observations from the afternoon were:

Many managers seem to fear that trying to engage with stakeholders inevitably brings conflict, but I don’t think that has be true, once stakeholders have  gone past the initial suspicion that people have that the organisation may be trying to manipulate them. It is a pity that people have learned from unfortunate experience. It is fear that most constrains engaging with stakeholders or indeed anyone.

It is only possible to engage people on their terms, in language and activity that makes sense to them.

People need to feel in control and to feel listened to. They also can work things out, so in practice there are fewer major substantive disagreements than people fear. The time spent in conversation and dialogue listening and exploring is time well spent that leads to wiser, stronger decisions and saves much time and expense later.

Engagement can only ever be invited and earned, never commanded or bought.

The output from the day has been transcribed and is available for you to read at your leisure here. If you have any questions on the document please get in touch.

Jonathan and I are hopeful that much more enjoyable, valuable and sustainable work can and will be done through sincere, invitational and earned engagement. And we believe we (us, you, everyone) have the methods to help us achieve this. And as our experience shows us, the answers are nearly always in the room, and in particular, in the hearts and minds of those closest to the front line. Closest to the customer. What do you think? Has the time come for a more engaging way to work or will coercion once again prevail?

 

Five star service from the gutter

While the sun shines I’m doing some house maintenance, namely fixing some guttering (note to my builder, water prefers to flow with gravity – not against it). In the course of my work I need to replace some parts. Some are made by Osma, some by Polypipe. Osma are by far the more expensive option (example – a gutter jointing bracket from Osma is almost £5, a similar Polypipe piece costs less than £2). There seems to be no discernible difference in the quality but I reckoned it was easier to replace like with like.

Osma – sold by Travis Perkins

I arrive at the shop and after a brief friendly chat with someone behind the desk another guy takes me into the yard. He points at where the Osma stuff is and then stands there while I fiddle about with stuff. The guy offers no advice, replies reluctantly to questions and is about as uninterested as he could possibly be. I pay for my (expensive) stuff and leave. To be fair, not a bad experience, but definitely underwhelming and not what I expect when I’m paying top dollar. Although as you’re about to read – the price ain’t what it’s all about.

Polypipe – sold by Plumbase

I arrive at the shop needing a replacement bracket. I have one with me as an example. A friendly guy asks to take the bracket from me and he takes a look. “yeah – we stock these, but this little fixer here” he points to a part of the bracket “it looks wrong.” “How long has it been installed?” the guy asks me. “Around 18 months” I reply. “Well I reckon that’s faulty then” says the helpful chap and quick as a flash he replaces the little piece at no charge and sends me on my way. What a difference. Hands on, interested, and positive. Friendly and fantastic!

I appreciate it can be more tricky when you distribute your brand through others, but in a couple of day’s time I’m going to need a whole load more bits and pieces to complete this project. I wonder where I’ll be returning to buy them?

 

A numbers game, sort of

I started blogging in January 2009. Since then I’ve had 33,884 visits to my site, 15,013 at the original wordpress domain and 18,871 over here. Over a quarter of the total visits (9,134 to be precise) have landed in the past five months. I’m pretty confident these are very modest numbers, and because I blog first and foremost for enjoyment, I’m absolutely fine with that. This is not the start of a pissing contest. I have previously promised to share information about the business and this feels like a useful place to start. So what have I observed?

Correlation

There is a close match between the number of posts I write, and the number of reads. No big surprise maybe, nevertheless the match really struck me when I lined the two sets of figures up for you this morning.

blog posts by month

blog views by month

Comments

Since I moved the blog here in April 2010 I’ve posted 145 times and these posts have generated 708 comments. A lot of the comments are mine in reply to other people but I think an average of nearly five comments per post shows a healthy level of interaction. I get a lot of satisfaction from receiving comments on the blog. I try and take time to read and visit many other blogs and comment on them too – it’s all one big conversation to me. I’ve worked hard at this reciprocal concept and I think it’s worth it. I learn loads from the comments I get here on the site and of course I learn from going elsewhere to read and engage in dialogue too.

It’s not just about the posts

As you can see from the screen shot below, the pages and posts which get the most visits here aren’t blog posts, but stuff related directly to the business. I think this observation is really important, particularly for small businesses like ours. I blog because I enjoy writing, sharing and learning and the visits we get are looking at much more than the blog posts. This feels like useful marketing to me. I have no way of knowing but I’m pretty sure if our website and blog were separate, the pages about who we are and what we do would probably not get nearly so many views.

Most visits

Sources

I think it’s worth a quick look at where the traffic to the website comes from. Since April 2010 roughly 30% of the visits are direct, 15% from search engines (Google a country mile ahead in that mini league), 50% are referred from places like LinkedIn, Twitter, HRZone and XpertHR (thanks to you all), the rest fall into “Others” (note to Google Analytics, that’s not very helpful). In the last month the figures are 23% direct, 23% search engines, 43% referred (a big chunk of this from Twitter), and 17% others.

I read a lot of great blogs which I imagine get a much bigger readership than this one, so I confess that writing this post has been a bit of a nervy experience for me. I can barely spell SEO let alone know how it works and what it does so there’s no technical inspiration here. I’m simply publishing this in the hope that people will find it useful. If you have any comments and feedback, and if there is any more detail you would like to see please get in touch and I’ll do my best to help. And of course – thanks as always for reading, I appreciate the time you invest here.