Great Value from Conversational Selling

I once had a shop floor job selling computers. I loved it because I got to meet loads of interesting people who had diverse needs. I would listen carefully to the customer as they told me about these needs, and expectations. I would check into the conversation periodically just to check I’d understood them clearly. Mainly I just listened, and showed genuine interest. At the end of the conversation the customer would often buy something.

After I’d worked in the store a few weeks, I was hauled in front of the big boss. Apparently there was a discrepancy in my figures. I’d become known for taking a while to allow a sale to happen. Whilst others round me busily matched customer to computer and moved on, I took longer. This amused folk as we were remunerated principally on commission. More sales, more money.

Turns out the discrepancy was around product returns. The returns against my sales were almost non-existent. There was the odd faulty bit of kit but hardly anyone was bringing anything back. Returns are a costly process, they take up time and cost a lot of money. As a result, though I was not the most productive sales person in terms of turnover, I was by far the most valuable. The big boss promoted me to manage a team. We agreed to shift the way we were remunerated from commission to a share in the value of the business. Our team subsequently earned very well from it. The value of good listening.

Smoking is good for you. Fact.

cigs

Productivity trumps presenteeism every time. Sure, input is necessary but output is what really counts. And we know that taking time out, little and often, helps us to stay sharp and to deliver. Here’s a little something that Katherine Wiid found out about and told me which may interest you:

A man by the name of Boice, has extensively researched the productivity of academics. Do you know that there is a differential of 7:1 between the best and ordinary academics?

Highly productive academics
* work early in the morning before the household gets up for 1 to 1.5 hours (maximum)
* work on one project at a time and working at it a little every day
* work in snatches of about 15 minutes and take mini breaks
* stop.

Of course, then they go into the office and attend to the busy-work of universities and the complementary work of teaching. In working regularly every day and STOPPING, they achieve 7 times more than people who “binge” work.

Despite this, we often see people running from meeting to meeting, oh so terribly busy. It feels like a competition to outbusy everyone else. What’s the driver? Fear? An attempt to make oneself indispensable? Whatever it is, a long day with no breaks serves no one well.

Which brings me to smoking. I was with a friend yesterday who suggested that maybe smoking is good for you? What!! He explained…

Most organisations I know barely if ever bat an eyelid when a smoker gets up, and pops out for a cigarette break. And yet they can be gone for upwards of fifteen minutes, several times a day. Imagine the questioning a non-smoker would get if once every hour or two they got up and wandered off for quarter of an hour. “Haven’t you got work to do?” “Aren’t you busy enough?” It probably wouldn’t be tolerated; peer group pressure at least would likely make the habit fail. Yet a much more dangerous habit at least brings with it the potential benefit of increased productivity. So you see it turns out that smoking is good for you.

OK I’m kidding, and so was he. It isn’t. What is much better is to create a culture where it’s not only OK to take regular breaks, it’s encouraged. So, if you are in a position of visible leadership. Take a break. Encourage someone to join you. Do it again, and again. Just enough that other folk know it’s OK to refresh and recharge for their benefit, and your benefit, and the customers benefit, and the shareholders benefit…

Healthy Habits

Dashing around London yesterday I spotted this sign in the doorway of Holland and Barrett.

Great idea! Will this single act save the planet? I doubt that, but if it achieves nothing else it will reduce the number of plastic bags blown on the wind into parks, playgrounds and high streets. Good work Holland and Barrett. I wonder what is stopping other retailers from pursuing a similar tactic? Why can’t the big supermarket chains just go ahead and follow suit? Come on Tesco, Sainsbury, Asda et al, get together, and agree to start charging your customers for plastic bags, or better still, just stop providing them at all. We’ll soon figure out more sustainable ways to get our shopping home, trust us, we will.